Loading...
Loading...
 videos

Home > Analysis > September 911 > Coincidences


1
Vote(s)

 9/11 Coincidences (Part 1)
Three Burning Buildings - One Result- How much more evidence do we need before the government and mainstream media finally talks about this issue? By ignoring this issue, the government and media are just insulting our intelligence. 9/11 witnesses - who include fire crew, police officers and media reporters - heard and saw explosions going off inside the towers, long before they actually fell. Many witnesses reported powerful explosions in the basements of the buildings long before they collapsed. Plus, controlled demolition experts agree that the collapses of the three buildings bear all of the hallmarks of a controlled demolition. For example, we see demolition "squibs" shooting out of the windows of the buildings before they started to collapse. All three buildings collapsed at near freefall speed. Building 7, which wasn't hit by a plane and contained only small scattered fires, came down symmetrically in just 6-seconds. And 6-weeks after 9/11, liquified steel was found under the rubble of all three buildings and the temperature was still in excess of 1500F. Jet-fuel simply cannot burn hot enough to reach that sort of temperature. And many of the steel beams found in the rubble of the three buildings were cut diagonally - in exactly the same way as shaped-charges slice through steel diagonally to bring a building straight down. Sulfur residue was also found on the steel beams. Sulfur used with thermite is called thermate -- which produces even faster results than thermite, reaching temperatures of over 4,000F. We also see red-hot molten steel dripping from the windows of the towers prior to their collapse. We really need to wake up to the facts and ask questions. If we don't, what does that say about us? If you haven't yet heard about this subject, please go to Google and find out about the melting point of steel, and about the maximum temperature that jet-fuel can reach, and about the use of thermate shaped-charges in controlled demolitions. Once you know these facts, you'll realise that those three buildings simply could NOT have collapsed in the way they did UNLESS they were brought down in a controlled demolition.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Odp1FO0Vmuw
www.youtube.com | Details

0
Vote(s)

 9/11 Coincidences (Part 2)
All At Freefall Speed - 9/11 witnesses - who include fire crew, police officers and media reporters - heard and saw explosions going off inside the towers, long before they actually fell. Many witnesses reported powerful explosions in the basements of the buildings long before they collapsed. Plus, controlled demolition experts agree that the collapses of the three buildings bear all of the hallmarks of a controlled demolition. For example, we see demolition "squibs" shooting out of the windows of the buildings before they started to collapse. All three buildings collapsed at near freefall speed. Building 7, which wasn't hit by a plane and contained only small scattered fires, came down symmetrically in just 6-seconds. And 6-weeks after 9/11, liquified steel was found under the rubble of all three buildings and the temperature was still in excess of 1500F. Jet-fuel simply cannot burn hot enough to reach that sort of temperature. And many of the steel beams found in the rubble of the three buildings were cut diagonally - in exactly the same way as shaped-charges slice through steel diagonally to bring a building straight down. Sulfur residue was also found on the steel beams. Sulfur used with thermite is called thermate -- which produces even faster results than thermite, reaching temperatures of over 4,000F. We also see red-hot molten steel dripping from the windows of the towers prior to their collapse. How much more evidence do we need before the government and mainstream media finally talks about this issue? By ignoring this issue, the government and media are just insulting our intelligence! We really need to wake up to the facts and ask questions. If we don't, what does that say about us? If you haven't yet heard about this subject, please go to Google and find out about the melting point of steel, and about the maximum temperature that jet-fuel can reach, and about the use of thermate shaped-charges in controlled demolitions. Once you know these facts, you'll realise that those three buildings simply could NOT have collapsed in the way they did UNLESS they were brought down in a controlled demolition.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=i7BSt9jhxPQ
www.youtube.com | Details

0
Vote(s)

 9/11 Coincidences (Part 3)
Bombs in the Buildings - Bombs, explosions, secondary explosions, explosive devices....how many more times do we need to hear these words being said by 9/11 witnesses before we start asking questions about what really happened on that awful day? These witnesses include fire crew, police officers and media reporters - who all heard and saw explosions going off inside the towers, long before they actually fell. Many witnesses reported powerful explosions in the basements of the buildings long before they collapsed. Plus, controlled demolition experts agree that the collapses of the three buildings bear all of the hallmarks of a controlled demolition. For example, we see demolition "squibs" shooting out of the windows of the buildings before they started to collapse. All three buildings collapsed at near freefall speed. Building 7, which wasn't hit by a plane and contained only small scattered fires, came down symmetrically in just 6-seconds. And 6-weeks after 9/11, liquified steel was found under the rubble of all three buildings and the temperature was still in excess of 1500F. Jet-fuel simply cannot burn hot enough to reach that sort of temperature. And many of the steel beams found in the rubble of the three buildings were cut diagonally - in exactly the same way as shaped-charges slice through steel diagonally to bring a building straight down. Sulfur residue was also found on the steel beams. Sulfur used with thermite is called thermate -- which produces even faster results than thermite, reaching temperatures of over 4,000F. We also see red-hot molten steel dripping from the windows of the towers prior to their collapse. How much more evidence do we need before the government and mainstream media finally talks about this issue? By ignoring this issue, the government and media are just insulting our intelligence! We really need to wake up to the facts and ask questions. If we don't, what does that say about us? If you haven't yet heard about this subject, please go to Google and find out about the melting point of steel, and about the maximum temperature that jet-fuel can reach, and about the use of thermate shaped-charges in controlled demolitions. Once you know these facts, you'll realise that those three buildings simply could NOT have collapsed in the way they did UNLESS they were brought down in a controlled demolition.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Pd8B-8Au-Wk
www.youtube.com | Details

0
Vote(s)

 9/11 Coincidences (Part 4)
1,000 Cameras and No Airplane ! - I am not saying that the Pentagon wasn't hit by a plane on 9/11, however we have every right to be suspicious when we look at the facts. My gut feeling is that the Pentagon WAS hit by a plane, but I find it hard to believe that the plane was the Flight 77 Boeing 757 jet. The Pentagon is the most guarded building on the planet, with countless CCTV cameras covering every part of the building both inside and out. Plus there are many establishments in the immediate area, such as gas stations, hotels, etc, that have CCTV cameras. Yet the US government refuses to release any images or video that actually shows a plane approaching the Pentagon on 9/11, let alone a Boeing 757. Within minutes of the crash, the FBI confiscated CCTV footage from all of the establishments in the immediate area, and they refuse to show us any of that footage. The only images they have released were only released after years of demands under the Freedom of Information Act, and none of those images show an actual airplane. If a Boeing 757 really did hit the Pentagon then why not show us the footage? And what about the lack of any wreckage from a Boeing 757, and the lack of bodies, and the fact that the damage to the Pentagon wall is not consistent with what you'd expect if it had been hit by a Boeing 757 -- the hole is way too small for a start. And if the alleged terrorists had wanted to wreak maximum damage, then why would they fly the plane into the only part of the Pentagon that had recently been re-inforced, and the only part of the Pentagon that housed the accountants who were looking into the disappearance of over a trillion dollars from the US economy? And in any case, the flight instructor of the alleged hijackers said that these people were useless at flying even the smallest aircraft, and yet we're expected to believe that they carried out an extremely difficult 360 degree menouvre and managed to fly the Boeing just a few feet from the ground as it approached the Pentagon. Whichever way you want to look at it, this just doesn't quite add up, it's like trying to put a square peg into a round hole.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=1rQ8_Qy0zp8
www.youtube.com | Details

0
Vote(s)

 9/11 Coincidences (Part 5)
PNAC: "A New Pearl Harbor" In 2,000, just before the republicans got back into the White House, a project set up by the neo-cons who now surround George W Bush, laid out its agenda for global domination in a document called the "Project for the New American Century". However, it stated that gaining public support for its aspirations would require a long process, UNLESS there was a catastrophic event like "a new Pearl Harbor". Its published aims have, alarmingly, come true.
If a group of people made a public statement saying that having a new Pearl Harbor would be the only way the public would support their agenda, and these same people were in positions that would allow them to conduct, permit or enable such an event when that event actually took place...would they deserve your suspicion? Well this is EXACTLY what happened. The very people with established motives for conducting an event like the one that took place on 9/11/2001 were responsible for national security when we had that most unlikely, unrealistic and implausible complete catastrophic failure of every single defense procedure in operation. Yet Americans look to these people for protection now.
The US military was running as many as 15 defense drills that day. Some of these drills were live fly hijacking simulations. Some of the drills were practicing for the possibility of having planes fly into government buildings. Could it be that someone decided that these drills would go live! Why have the corporate news media refused to report the drills to the public? Could it be because you would start asking REAL questions about that day? Well, it's time that you start asking questions because you may just be supporting the real terrorists!
http://youtube.com/watch?v=m3JmXQ-z8S4
www.youtube.com | Details

0
Vote(s)

 9/11 Coincidences (Part 6)
"ABLE DANGER" Terror Drills on 9/11. On the morning of September 11 2001, the US Defence Agencies had been running pre-planned simulations of terrorist attacks involving crashing planes into the WTC and Pentagon. The Bush administration described the event as "a bizarre coincidence". The matter was not mentioned by the media. True to form for false-flag terror attacks, it seems that these Military Drills were used as cover for the attack.
Webster Tarpley lays out a very convincing case that military drills were used as cover and pretext for the attacks of 9/11. Using drills, our own military resources were directed, in supposed practice attacks, which were 'flipped live' by moles working within the government. Using such drills, most of the fighter air cover of the US was redirected to Alaska and Canada. Other drills were used to inject dozens of false 'blips' onto FAA radar screens. Still other drills, ones using 'live fly' hijacked aircraft, were apparently 'flipped live' and the planes crashed into the towers under remote control.
The 'hijackers' are mere patsies, DOD controlled "red team" actors. The supposed 'hijackers' are essentially actors trained by the military and CIA to play the part of the "red team" in simulated terrorist drills. The now famous "Able Danger" program was most likely one half, the red half, of a hijack drill the other half being "Able Warrior."
http://youtube.com/watch?v=em_XyTeNA1g
www.youtube.com | Details